I suppose all parenting is based on some sort of ideology, but when does ideology interfere and cross the line of what is in a child’s best interest?

It’s too bad that far too often, a parent’s desire to influence a social movement leaves them vulnerable in order to make a point or act in protest.

For example, and I know this is a touchy subject with some, but parents who refuse to vaccinate their children, claiming that it’s all part of some conspiracy theory to line the pockets of pharmaceutical companies. Many parents are so busy trying to find ways that vaccinations cause more harm than good, I think they forgot why vaccines were introduced to begin with. How much evidence does one need to make the logical conclusion that your political gain may compromise the health of your child?

For example, a recent Measles outbreak in San Diego:

On Jan. 25, the 7-year-old’s parents took the youngster to the Children’s Clinic of La Jolla. The child may have coughed and sneezed in the office, thus infecting four other children.

Those four patients returned to the clinic between Feb. 5 and 8, possibly spreading the virus to 60 other children.

All of the 11 confirmed patients, from 10 months to 9 years old, were not vaccinated either because they were younger than 1 – the minimum age for measles inoculation – or because their parents objected to having them vaccinated, county officials said.

…and, although it has NEVER been proven that vaccinations cause Autism, and countless studies fail to even make a link, there are still those holdouts that don’t care what science has to offer, the political statement of pharma vitriol means more to them than what they consider to be a minuscule risk. Nevermind that the risk WIDENS and INCREASES as more and more parents decide not to vaccinate. (Oh, the irony!) Facts, in these cases, don’t seem to be a priority.
One physician tries to uncover the psychology of it all…

It seems to have taken on a life of its own and may be a good example of a socio-psychological phenomenon known as “groupthink,” a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive group.

There may be many parents who will never be convinced that the benefits of immunization for their children in most cases outweigh the risks. In free countries, that is their prerogative and I, as a physician, accept that.

Society must understand that such convictions must not dictate public health policy. Failure to offer people a sound vaccination program would no doubt result in a resurgence of contagions such as polio, measles, and heaven forbid, perhaps even smallpox, should the wild virus ever be reintroduced into the world.

The human toll in lives and suffering, long forgotten by our postmodern world, would be incalculable in a jet age which rapidly spreads infectious disease to all continents.

I’m sure we all have different, conflicting examples of “group think” and some “group think” is beneficial to a child, like the disdain of child abuse, but when does group think interfere with our own sensibilities? I think the Internet, for better or worse, has propagated much of this and found validations for practices in which some critical thinking would go a long way. I can think of a bunch just off the top of my head, can’t you?

Bookmark to:
   

Adding more fuel to my immunization argument, I would like to continue to thank the anti-vac’rs for spreading misery through ignorance:

All Headline News reports the outcome from a CDC investigation regarding 66 people that contracted the measles in the United States last year, some were from Indiana and the findings show the following:

The hospital records show that 33 people from Indiana and one from Illinois became infected. Three people were hospitalized, but no one died.

Only two of the 34 had been vaccinated against measles.

According to the CDC report, “The outbreak occurred because measles was imported into a population of children whose parents had chosen not to vaccinate their children because of safety concerns, despite evidence that measles-containing vaccine is safe and effective.”

Bookmark to:
   

The decision of parents who choose not to vaccinate their children is one of great irony. The only reason they are able to even entertain withholding this proven method of reducing suffering — and in many cases, saving lives — is based solely on the fact that most people do vaccinate. The problem arises when the chain is broken, and a gap is created that allows various communicable diseases to spread from person to person. Gossip coupled with a steady diet of internet fallacies lead people to misinformed and misguided information on the safety of immunizations.

Apparently, I’m not the only one that feels this way. Scientists, doctors and Michael D. Shaw, from Healthnewsdigest.com are none too pleased with the onslaught of parents making decisions based on faulty logic and information:

(HealthNewsDigest.com).. One of the greatest triumphs of preventive medicine—not to mention public health policy—is the overwhelming effectiveness of vaccination programs. Tens of millions of children in the United States alone, and even larger numbers of individuals throughout the world, will never know the terror of polio, measles, smallpox, whooping cough, diphtheria, tetanus, and other diseases—all because of regular vaccinations. Despite all of this, a small but increasingly vocal minority of parents and politicians are leading a campaign against the wholesale use of vaccinations. (Michael D. Shaw, Correspondent at Large - HealthNewsDigest.com)

By alleging a dubious—and absolutely unproven—link between vaccines and isolated cases of meningitis and even autism (a claim that stretches credulity), these activists threaten to undo over a half-century of medical progress, exposing children to deadly diseases that, at least in the third world, were only recently vanquished or contained. This course of action is a death sentence for millions and is a clarion call for better education at home and abroad. It also indicates what can happen when people have it too good, have way too much time on their hands, and have very selective memories.

And, it must be said, this is just what can happen when science becomes politicized, and is offered up to a public not well-versed in matters scientific.

This kind of hysteria that was once considered part of a naive society, falling for a “War of the Worlds”, as it were, has been striking England over the last few years as it becomes all too evident that immunizations only work with the commitment of communities. Fear and ignorance envelop their common sense. It isn’t only their children at risk, but babies too young to be immunized yet — it falls out of the realm of personal choice, as these decisions don’t just affect their immediate families, but society as a whole.

Thermisol has long been dismissed by the science community as a cause of autism, yet the media and parents who represent those with a dangerous amount of a little information, has lead a growing population who are not protected from serious diseases.

Mr. Shaw cites more disturbing trends:

Consider measles, not quite the benign childhood affliction some people think it is. Six to 20 percent of the people who contract the disease will get an ear infection, diarrhea, or even pneumonia. One out of 1000 people with measles will develop inflammation of the brain. For every 1,000 children who get measles, one or two will die from it.

Before the measles vaccine became available, there were approximately 450,000 measles cases and an average of 450 measles-associated deaths were reported each year. Widespread use of measles vaccine has led to a greater than 99% reduction in measles cases in the U.S. compared with the pre-vaccine era.

However, once the naysayers grabbed hold of public opinion, measles inoculations lapsed in 1989; 55,000 people got sick and 120 died. Misguided parents, somehow concluding that vaccination is worse than the disease it prevents, arrange “measles parties,” deliberately exposing children to measles so they would get the disease very young and consequently avoid vaccination. Well, no one said you had to be smart to be a parent!

For me, it illustrates a scary trend in which people have a large capacity to disseminate junk science and pass it off as legit. Conspiracy theories about pharmaceutical companies abound, while at the same time a number of the anti-vaccination crowd have their own disingenuous ulterior motives and political reasons behind it. Some agendas just contradict public health and safety and this is an example of that. Parents need to stop thinking they know more about science and health than scientists and health care experts. Being a parent does not automatically give you the license to perform surgery — know your capabilities and get well-rounded and accurate information. Don’t automatically trust political sources and the internet.

Bookmark to: