IP Web


Name: Andrea McDowell

View all of Andrea's posts

Andrea's Blog/Website

More about Andrea:

Andrea is a full-time working mother of one preschool daughter. In the tiny spaces between the job, the house, the husband, the daughter and the diabetes, she finds the time to edit a quarterly webzine, blog, write fiction, scrapbook and read--powered on too little sleep and too much caffeine.

 

Return to blog index


Filed under: Health

National Donor Sabbath

Posted November 10, 2006 at 9:03 am by Andrea

One of the undeniably good things to come out of blogging, for me, has been my friendship with Moreena of falling down is also a gift, and a few other places which may or may not be competitors of Imperfect Parent, so I won’t link to them directly. Regardless, Moreena is a compassionate, intelligent and generous person whose posts often make me cry at work (which is embarassing when you’re out of kleenex and are reduced to using an old receipt from the bottom of your purse, hoping that you’re not spreading ink all over your reddened, tear-stained face).

Moreena’s oldest daughter, Annika, has had two liver transplants as the result of a congenital disease called Biliary Atresia; she is about to be put back on the waiting list for a third. She is six.

And as she reminded me lately, this weekend is the National Donor Sabbath, an interfaith event and celebration to increase awareness of organ donation.
So many of you will hear this information already this weekend; but for those of you who, like me, rarely darken a church door, here is information about how to become an organ donor and frequently asked questions about organ donation.
And if you have a blog or website and would like to increase awareness of this incredibly important issue, here is a button you can use (right-click, save as, and upload as required):

?‚? I am an organ donor

Tag:
Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Filed under: General

Conference Update

Posted October 29, 2006 at 10:21 am by Andrea

My presentation on Friday was part of a panel about mommy blogging. There were five of us; the other four covered mommy blogging as a genre, how blogging about mothering publicly can affect your mothering, mommy blogging as folk art, and how advertising is beginning to affect mommy blogging. My topic was the experience of writing about mothering a child who is, in some way, different–whether it be disability or illness or just an undiagnosable genetic syndrome–on the internet.

In one of those moments of serendipity–or perhaps sensitivity after exposing myself to this issue for a few months–yesterday there was a section in the Toronto Star about access to post-secondary education for students with disabilities, and how attitudes are slowly changing. The articles gave me a great deal of hope–perhaps we, as the last generation to expect students with differences or issues or delays to be segregated educationally, are the last of the dinosaurs, the last to feel uncomfortable in the presence of a child not regularly featured in Parents magazine. Perhaps stand-up comics who can’t stand up and PhD students who can’t spell without assistance will simply be accepted, normal parts of advanced education for our children, and workplaces will automatically accomodate them because schools have automatically accomodated them, and they expect the world to work that way.

Perhaps it will be like the second wave of feminism–not perfect, not fixing everything by any stretch, but accomplishing nonetheless such a sea change that the way things used to be, the world of lowered expectations and isolation and segregation, is no longer imaginable.

I hope so. Because when, after finishing that, I find this letter about the death of a man with primordial dwarfism, I dread the world my daughter will live in.

(I’ll come back and write about the actual panel and how it went once my co-presenters have had a chance to decompress and post their own talks, so that I can point to them. And parts of this post will end up on my own blog tomorrow–but I didn’t want anyone to think I’d had that heart attack. It actually all went very well.)

Tags: , , , ,
Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Filed under: General

Ack!

Posted October 25, 2006 at 11:16 am by Andrea

I feel like a cat with a fur ball. Ack! Ack!

It’s all I can say this week, because I am dying with excitement (ack!) and anxiety (ack!) over talking Friday at the Motherlode conference in Toronto about my experiences blogging about a child with physical differences. (Ack!) The conference is featuring mothering authors such as Andi Buchanan (who wrote MotherShock) (Ack!) and Ann Crittenden (author of The Price of Motherhood) (Ack!). I am sharing panel space with several well-known mother bloggers, including MUBAR, Postcards from the Mothership, Hello Josephine, and the Mother of All Blogs’ Ann Douglas. (Ack!) People have already been signing up for our session (ack!), which the organizers have been promoting on the materials mailed out to registrants (ack!); I splurged on new shoes, even (ack!).

Only to find this in the Toronto Star a few days ago. OK, scroll past the brilliant part at the beginning where the author describes how society is all talk, no action about supporting motherhood to where she writes about the Motherlode.

Do you see this? This part right here?

But O’Reilly says this year’s event takes it to a whole new level. It features 200 speakers from around the world on such diverse topics as teen mothers, raising bi-racial children, post-partum depression, mothering children with disabilities, and mommy blogs.

Mommy blogs! That’s me! I mean, us! Ack!

I’ll be here afterwards to blog about it; and if I’m not, call the ambulance. I probably had a heart attack.

Ack!

Tags: ,
Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Filed under: Criminal Justice

Fabulous. Thank you so much.

Posted October 23, 2006 at 9:23 am by Andrea

Because Canada really wants to accept America’s pedophiliac exiles. I mean, Canada’s children are surely so undesirable that he won’t pose any kind of threat here, would he? So allowing him to remain free as long as he has no access to American children is clearly proof that we inhabit the best of all possible worlds.

Tags: , ,
Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Filed under: General, Social Issues

Another reason to throw out that “Math is Hard” Barbie Doll

Posted October 20, 2006 at 7:25 am by Andrea

Researchers at the University of British Columbia have reported on an experiment that demonstrates that when girls are told they are naturally worse at math, they perform worse on tests.

As one researcher said:

“We told one group of women a made-up story about scientists discovering a math gene on the Y (male) chromosome, and those women got only half as many answers correct as the others ???‚¬??? possibly because they choked under the pressure,” said UBC psychology professor Steven Heine, whose study with PhD student Ilan Dar-Nimrod was published yesterday in Science magazine.

“But the women who were told there is no genetic difference in math ability between men and women did better, possibly because it’s liberating to learn you don’t have a genetic disadvantage.”

CNN also reported on the story (see? I do read news sites besides the TO Star!) and had more details on how the study was administered:

Heine and doctoral student Ilan Dar-Nimrod wanted to see how people are affected by stereotypes about themselves. They divided more than 220 women into four groups and administered math and reading comprehension tests between 2003 and 2006. Their results are reported in Friday’s issue of the journal Science.

The women were given a math test, then asked to read an essay, and then given a second math exam.

In two groups the women averaged between five and 10 correct answers out of 25 math questions. In the other two they averaged between 15 and 20 correct.

The women in the lower-scoring groups read essays that either contended that there is a genetic difference between men and women in math ability, or discussed the images of women in art — a reading which did not discuss math but was designed to remind them of being female.

Those two groups not only fell short of the other women, but their performance declined between the two math tests, meaning they scored lower after reading the essays than before.

It’s a process psychologists call a stereotype threat, Heine explained. “If a member of a group for which there is a negative stereotype is in a position to test the stereotype, they are likely to choke under the pressure.”

What does this mean for parents? In yet another case of Experts Telling Us What We Already Knew, don’t tell your children that they can’t do such-and-such because of their sex. Or their height, or their eye colour, or their skin colour, or whatever. Being reminded of a stereotype that claims one is innately incapable of performing a particular task tends to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. And if your kids are exposed to these stereotypes from other sources (TV, books, magazines, schools, friends), work with them to understand that the stereotype isn’t true, and even if it was, it wouldn’t necessarily apply to them.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Filed under: General, Religion

The Token Witch

Posted October 19, 2006 at 7:17 am by Andrea

Everything that follows is solely my own opinion. Even moreso than with most religious discussions, because wicca is so new and so varied that you could ask ten witches (if you could find ten witches) what their beliefs are, and you would get ten different answers.

What follows is the basic stuff that most of us agree on. ?‚? I thought about including my own beliefs and the tradition I’m part of–but that would take years. But if anyone has any specific questions, I’ll try to answer them.

Most witches (I’ll use the term interchangeably with wiccan for this, though for some folks they’re separate) are panentheists, which means that deity is in the world. Everything material is a manifestation of the divine, from the smallest microbe to the universe itself. The wiccan concept of deity holds that god/dess is destructive and creative, good and bad. Death is considered part of life, and destruction the necessary precursor to creation.

The divine is personalized as both a god and a goddess, who are two manifestations of a single nameless deity. The names of the god and the goddess vary by tradition; and in many traditions, they are also considered to have a thousand faces–the minor gods and goddesses.

There are two basic sets of beliefs regarding the god and the goddess. In one, they are equals; in the other, the goddess is primary. The latter is also sometimes referred to as goddess worship or Dianic witchcraft/wicca. It is more common so far as I know to regard them as equals. Because there is a god and a goddess and they are considered equal, witchcraft believes in sex equality (though perspectives on the differences between the sexes can vary greatly).

It is also an earth religion, which means that practice is based on where you live. Religious observations depend on the phase of the moon and the season. So, for instance, on Ostara or Eostre (the spring equinox), observations include fertility symbols that reflect spring and burgeoning life, such as eggs, rabbits, flowers, etc. If that sounds familiar, it should; when the evangelists say that Easter is based on a pagan holiday, they’re right. Yule, celebrated on the winter solstice, celebrates life in the midst of death, because while it is the darkest day of the year, it is also the day when the light starts to return; evergreens, holly berries, gifts, bonfires are all features of the holiday. Again, this may sound familiar.

Because wicca/witchcraft is an earth religion, and because it’s panentheistic, environmentalism is very strong. Other living things and their habitats are considered sacred. Which isn’t to say that nothing must ever be cut down or destroyed, but that if it’s going to be, you have to have a very good reason.

The stickiest issue is magic and spells. It’s true that witches cast spells; but it’s not a solitary person with a vendetta twisting the arm of reality to make a dishonest buck. The definition of magic most often used is “the art of changing consciousness at will”–not reality, consciousness. The focus of change is explicitly on the self. And spells are most like prayers, only instead of words, you use objects–candles, or paper, or plants, or whatever. You are asking the universe or god/dess for what you want; but that doesn’t mean you’ll get it.

I know the bookstores are full of crap in the wicca sections with bright pink covers and titles like “how to turn your boyfriend into a frog,” but this drivel has as much in common with wicca and witchcraft as books about how to use your guardian angel to become wealthy have to do with christianity–which is to say, not much.

The last thing worth pointing out is that witchcraft is not evangelical. We don’t believe that there is one True religion; all of them are equally true, so to us/me, it really doesn’t matter what faith you believe in so long as you’re not trying to interfere with my rights to practice my own. Every once in a while, someone goes nuts over the perceived subliminal intentions of books like The Wizard of Oz or Harry Potter, believing that they are a sneaky way of getting young people to adopt wicca. Trust me when I say, first of all, that they have nothing in common with our beilefs, and secondly, we have absolutely no interest in doing so.

Tags: , ,
Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Filed under: General

Labels

Posted October 12, 2006 at 12:12 pm by Andrea

(This is, in part, written as response to a post below–since this went way too long to be a comment–and in part a beginning?‚? answer to the?‚? question from an older post of my own, ‘What makes you a witch?’ Not a very interesting answer, to be sure; but I’ll get there eventually.)

?‚? I’ve spent a good part of the last fifteen years of my life collecting labels the way some collect baseball cards. I gather it’s not the in thing to do.

I’ve wondered (and please don’t take offence) if people who react to labels are themselves so thoroughly part of the cultural mainstream that they have no need of them, and don’t realize how life-saving an appropriate label can be. For instance, I’m diabetic. I do eat cake and chocolate, if you’re wondering; I also poke myself with various shaped pins many times over the course of a day. This keeps me alive. Rather than explaining to each person who stares with fascinated horror as I plunge a two-inch pin into my abdomen that my pancreas doesn’t work due to an autoimmune disease and without these injections of insulin?‚? I’d die, I can say “I’m diabetic.” Much faster. The fascinated horror changes and the conversation turns to somthing more interesting.

Or “asthmatic.” Another label, but it sure beats describing the function (or lack thereof) of my lungs when I take the cigarette out of your hands and stamp it on the ground. (That was a joke. I’ve never stomped on anyone’s cigarette. They’re expensive, aren’t they?)

Several labels in my extensive collection never raise an eyebrow, and I have never heard, while using them, “Why do you want to label yourself?” Writer, for instance. Mother. Wife. Civil Servant. Baker. Reader. Blogger. No wrinkled noses, no pointed objections to the use of certain words to hem people in to a certain kind of existence. In fact I’ll bet that if I were to avoid calling myself a mother (though it is certainly a label that comes loaded with all kinds of baggage and associations) and insist on describing my relationship to my daughter in more personal terms, most people would find it bizarre.

It’s the other labels that make people uncomfortable: Feminist. Witch. Anarchist. Environmentalist.?‚?

I’ll bet at least one of those loaded words comes equipped in your mind with a pre-cast image, complete with age, sex, relationship status, wardrobe, hobbies and intelligence level. Perhaps one of those labels you consider incompatible with another, or perhaps not. Perhaps they seem incompatible with a label on a previous list: can a wife be a feminist? Can a civil servant be an anarchist? Can a witch be a mother?

That is why I embrace these troubled words and their difficult history: I want to confront people’s expectations. I want them to have to consider me in relationship to their stereotypes. I want them to have to bust that stereotype in their head wide open, so it can contain me.

There’s no photograph associated with my posts yet (sorry, Jessica; the only one I can find where I don’t look like a drooling idiot is two years old. Is that recent enough?), so let me describe myself. I am 31, 5′8″, 145 lbs. Today I am wearing a grey knee-length straight skirt, a leaf-green snug sweater with a v-neck, black tights, and a cute pair of kitten heels. My hair is mousy brown and about collarbone length. I never wear black, except for socks, tights and shoes–I prefer bright colours. I spend most of my spare time reading voraciously from almost every genre and category. I’m straight as an arrow, unfortunately. I’ll leave you to draw your own conclusions about my intelligence.

Every noun in the English language is a label. Imagine living the rest of your life without the word ‘apple,’ or ‘cookie,’ or ‘bicycle,’ or ‘athlete.’ We use nouns–labels–to communicate efficiently and effectively with other people. We label ourselves to communicate who we are in the fewest words possible (though some, like ‘witch,’ tend to require a fair bit of backstory). As far as I can tell, we resist labels when we perceive them to be derogatory. “Why should I label myself?” we cry; when what we really mean is, “I don’t like the stereotype of that label.”

I believe people have the right to name themselves. I would never force a label on someone who rejected it; it would be disrespectful and rude. Not everyone has to spend their lives confronting the prejudices of other people in deeply personal and potentially hurtful ways. But I do think that rejecting a label because of its stereotype only strengthens the stereotype, which in most cases is unfounded. We’ve essentially lost feminism as a useful word because right-wing talk radio hosts associated it with fanaticism, hatred and intolerance. Calling myself a feminist is my small way of confronting those ugly prejudices with the truth.

Witch has been lost to a millenia-long propoganda project, tying it together with devil-worship, blood sacrifice, and immoral practices. Not to mention general physical hideousness. Before you give much credence to those stereotypes, you might want to know that christians in the early centuries were accused of the same acts.

Names are powerful. Words are powerful. I won’t cede that power to someone who hates me (as the creators of ‘feminazi’ or the infant-blood-drinking witch image certainly do). I won’t abandon an accurate label because someone has misdefined it as a deliberate act of social control. When I name myself accurately–when I?‚? use the right label–I sometimes see that someone has had to change their conceptions of what those names mean because it didn’t match who I am. There is a small crack in that stereotype where it used to be seemless; and that crack gives me immeasurable joy.

Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Filed under: Social Issues

PPD and Infanticide

Posted October 9, 2006 at 9:12 am by Andrea

I’m not sure how far news of this has spread, but recently a young mother in Barrie was accused of killer her toddler and infant daughters. It has launched the usual firestorm of controversy: What is postpartum depression? How much is a PPD sufferer responsible for their actions? How much is her family and/or partner responsible for not recognizing it and taking steps to prevent such an act?

?‚? According to an article in the Toronto Star (I promise; I do read other newspapers) not only is Post-Partum Psychosis incredibly rare, afflicting only one out of 500 or 1000 postpartum women, but of those women only about five per cent will go on to attempt to harm their children. What will tip that small percentage over the line?

?‚? One stressor that doesn’t get enough attention, he says, is sleep disruption. Lack of support is also a factor.

“I can’t underestimate (the importance of) the environment or circumstances,” says Brizendine.

What may send a woman predisposed to depression or bipolar disease down one path rather than another after childbirth, she says, is support from husband and family or lack of it.

I can’t tell you how happy I was to see an article that mentioned motherhood itself–the sleep disruption, change in role and extra work–as a significant stressor in and of itself. When Frances was born one month early and with reflux disease so severe I couldn’t put her down for the twelve hours of each day my husband was at work, when she woke every forty-five minutes at night for weeks on end, refused to nap unless in physical contact with me, and refused bottles, to be told that the resulting strain and depression were due to hormones was insulting and infuriating.

?‚? If only they had stopped the article there, and I’d never read this:

?‚? Symptoms of postpartum mental illness include changes in behaviour or personality and inattention to personal hygiene or household organization.

?‚? Household organization? Household organization?

?‚? Then we must all be ill, because I don’t know a single woman whose household remained organized after the arrival of a new baby.

Tags: ,
Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Filed under: Social Issues

Part of the Job

Posted October 5, 2006 at 11:36 am by Andrea

Can I admit to you that I am terrified of raising a daughter?

When a man breaks into a Denver classroom, chases out the boys, binds and sexually assaults the girls before shooting them–when another man breaks into an Amish one-room schoolhouse (apparently because it would be easy) and forces the boys out to bind and slaughter girls–then I think of Casey’s post at Expectant Waiting:

If my daughters are lucky, they’ll grow up with a vague awareness of the hate that surrounds them.

If they’re unlucky, a man will bust in on their classroom, rape them, and execute them.

And just in case I think I’m safe here, with those killings so far away, I will read about two boys in my own town who pinned a twelve-year-old girl to the ground and set her on fire with lighter fluid–as a lark.

I want to keep Frances safe; I also want her to be a full and self-confident person who will fearlessly find and demand her own place in the world. I can’t do both. It makes me crazy.

Finding an acceptable level of risk is, for me, the hardest part of this motherhood thing so far. According to some, no level of risk is ok: I’ve seen newspaper articles instructing parents not to use mechanized baby swings (they can trigger frenzied rages in dogs and cats, apparently), to bolt televisions to the stands, and to stay within arm’s reach of your children in a swimming pool or lake at all times. This seems extreme, but certainly by not doing these things I am accepting a slightly increased risk of harm.

This is hard enough–when I feel like I can assess the information and the probabilities and make a reasonable and informed choice–but hate? How do I control for hate? How do I assess the chances and outcomes of hate? I can’t. I can’t, and short of locking her in the basement (which would surely be more harmful to her than almost anything the world could do) there’s nothing I can do. Somehow, someday soon, I’ll have to open the front door and let her walk through it on her own, to find friends and make choices and work and build a life and possibly confront hate and be gunned down by a madman with a grudge against girls. Or lit on fire by her friends. I don’t want her to fear the world, so I will hold the door open for her with a smile.

And work, work, work my whole life against the hate that makes the world dangerous for her.

Tags: , , ,
Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Filed under: General

Newspaper Agrees: Andrea is Real

Posted October 3, 2006 at 8:35 am by Andrea

Hallowe’en must be coming; I saw the annual “say, did you know that witches are real?” article in the travel section of the weekend newspaper. I’ve read these articles every year in a variety of publications from teen magazines to serious newspapers with the same mix of bemusement and frustration: I am a witch. I know I’m real.

It’s true! I’m not just a collection of computer-generated random words.

Still, I suppose it’s nice to get the public exposed to the idea that witches aren’t just black cardboard silhouettes of a woman in a pointy hat riding a broomstick.

I have a deep ambivalence to the Hallowe’en caricature: I know where she comes from, I understand that people enjoy her, and very few would believe that witchcraft-the-religion as I (and a few million other people) practice it has anything to do with this hoary old stereotype. I don’t want to get rid of her; I don’t even necessarily want people to stop calling her a witch. But it does make life complicated.

On the weekend, I bought my daughter some Hallowe’en-themed foam-shape stickers so she could make some cards for her friends (she likes foam shape stickers, so really it was an excuse to spend a few dollars knowing that it would get her to sit quietly at her arts table for an hour while I read a book). Her favourite shape was the circle, which she insisted on calling “suns,” probably because it was the simplest. The others required explanation before she would use them–the bat, the moon, the hissing cat, the ghost, the jack-o-lantern, and the other one.

“What’s this shape, Mummy?”

“That’s a … a witch.”

She’s too young now to understand or care, but one day sometime around Hallowe’en she’s going to look at me, the woman who wears blue jeans and a ponytail and hardly ever touches a broom even to sweep the floor, and this creepy bogeywoman, and wonder how we can both be called the same thing. And I have no idea what I’m going to tell her.

Maybe between now and then something magical will happen. Maybe one day I’ll open a magazine or a newspaper and see an article about Wicca or witchcraft. Maybe it will neither accuse me of slaughtering babies to drink their blood nor decry the intolerance of various governments who believe that my faith doesn’t require constitutional protection. Maybe it will have nothing to do with Harry Potter, Charmed, The Craft or The Wizard of Oz. And maybe it will even be published while Hallowe’en costumes aren’t hanging in the local grocery store. Maybe I’ll be reading it in July.

If that ever happens, I’ll know we’re getting somewhere.

Bookmark to:
Add to sk*rt Add to digg Add to reddit 
Next Page »

Categories:

Hot Topics:

Jon and Kate plus 8 (8212 comments)
Last comment by: Grandma frm Ks. on 2008-05-17 00:47:20

M-M-M-My Mirena (21 comments)
Last comment by: Jenna Roberts on 2008-05-17 00:06:36

Selling for Scholars (2 comments)
Last comment by: Allison G. on 2008-05-16 23:11:36

Co sleepers anonymous (2 comments)
Last comment by: Rita on 2008-05-16 21:40:10

Jon and Kate Plus 8 - Color Me Gosselin (490 comments)
Last comment by: Christine Carrera on 2008-05-16 20:45:45

Recent Posts:

Selling for Scholars

Co sleepers anonymous

Mom should have known better

Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda…But Probably Won’t

Building A Nest In My Mantra (aka: What I Learned From Supernanny)

Advertisement
Our supporters:

Our Feeds:
Entire Blog
Criminal Justice
Education
Entertainment
Family
General
Health
Heard on the Net
Humor
MILF Resources
News & Politics
Parenting
Products & Tips
Religion
Social Issues


Archives:

Currently on
The Imperfect Parent:

Home/Office
by Dana Tuszke

The IP Bookshelf

Mominatrix
by Kristen Chase

The Parental is Political
by Julie Marsh

Growing Pains
by Elizabeth Thompson

Return to The Imperfect Parent

"We all suffer from the preoccupation that there exists... in the loved one, perfection." -- Sidney Poitier