Bring your Baby to Work?
Yesterday’s edition of the New York Times posted this article by Abby Ellin about how the economic downturn may force companies to make accomodations to working parents to avoid losses in productivity from extended materinity/paternity leaves. For some folks, apparently, it’s a win-win. They can clean junior’s bottom while keeping the bottom line in the black.
To be honest, the thought of bringing my 5 year-old Boo to the office makes me shudder. And let’s not talk about her 1.5 year old little bro, the Doodlenator. In my case, it would bring my productivity to a complete standstill - even if there was on-site daycare.
You see, I’m pretty much a work/home separator kind of personality. I don’t really dump my baggage from the office on my husband or kids and I try to keep the family intrusions at the office to a minimum. Yes, there are times that I have to finish a project at home, or handle a conference call from my couch while doling out OJ to a sick kid as she watches Sesame Street. And there are times that I need to shut my door for a parent-teacher discussion while I’m at work. But hauling my two bipedal hurricanes to the office on a regular basis? Hell-to-the-no!
I see how it could work for some folks. It would really depend on the nature of your work, the nature of your kids, and your bosses’ support of a “family friendly” work environment. I’m also a bit sensitive to my colleagues who aren’t married or don’t have kids. After all, do they need my little germ factories playing peek a boo around their desks? If I can bring my progeny to the office, why can’t they bring their four-legged kids in? To me, it just opens up a pandoa’s box.
What do you think? What’s your office policy? What would happen if they opened the flood gates and let your kids in?
Tags: at-work childcare, bringing baby to work, maternity leave alternative, New York Times |
3 Responses to “Bring your Baby to Work?”
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately in an effort to remove commercial messages, irrelevancies, excessive foul language, racist/sexist/hateful comments, spoofed/cloaked IPs and/or personal attacks and will be edited/deleted at our discretion. Thank you for your patience.




Posted
January 4, 2009 at
2:17 pm by





1. Tricia
January 5, 2009 @ 6:03 pm
I suppose it may depend on the type of work, but I’m skeptical. I’m self empolyeed and work from home, and when my four-year-old spends time in my office, I accomplish very little work-related. Sometimes I will even let clients go to voice mail simply because I can’t be a professional and a mom at the exact same time.
2. Kelly_Belle
January 5, 2009 @ 8:19 pm
I really think it would depend on the office you worked in or what kind of job you had…but I really couldn’t imagine taking my little 2 (almost 3) year old to any job. She is a handful 24/7 and really doesn’t like to sit still for more than a nano-second. I applaud places that do allow it…it’s a great step!
3. Kymberly
January 7, 2009 @ 5:46 pm
I’m skeptical because in a tight job market I would see (and have heard studies saying) that things swing the other way. Employers don’t have to be so “accomodating” because, frankly, there are people waiting to take your jobs that don’t want to take their babies to work and/or stay gone longer. Sad but true.