While the left tries to rationalize the work of insurgents or find new ways to blame the United States of unfathomable atrocities on children and humanity that these evil bastards (Islamo facists) inflict, I will not stand by silent and allow anybody to excuse their behavior. It has become a social faux pas to differentiate between good and evil in certain political groups in America. Why?

Even though Ann Coulter is farther right of center than I prefer and makes her living off of hyperboles and shock talk, she does bring up an interesting contradiction that I often find on the left and one of the reasons why I think the left are bad spokespeople and inferior advocates for children. Jim Kouri writes of this contradiction that I was never able to accept or understand in his article, Ann Coulter’s Right: Liberals Always Aid Terrorists and Thugs on The Conservative Voice:

One of her major assertions is that as a rule Democrats will always side with murderers, robbers and terrorists. They don’t side with rapists only because the crime of rape provides an opportunity to score points with feminists while denigrating white males. Unless, that is, the rapist happens to be black and the victim white, in which case they will side with the rapist because it allows them to indulge in race politics and utter soundbites about lynchings in the south.

It appears the Dems are unintentionally proving Coulter’s point during the Israeli battle against arguably the most powerful terrorist group on the planet, Hezbollah.

For instance, Senate Democratic leaders on Friday demanded that President George W. Bush dispatch “a high-level special envoy” to the Middle East to work with allies and negotiate an end to the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah terrorists who are using civilians as shields in Lebanon.

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, said in a letter to Bush — that was simultaneously delivered to every major newsroom in the world — that they were “surprised” that Secretary of State Condi Rice planned only a brief visit to the region.

While saying about ten times a day that they support Israel, they are taking issue with the Bush Administration’s lack of a plan to bring about a cease-fire. The good senators are very upset that Bush’s “disengagement” is allowing the Israelis to kill, maim and injure every terrorist they can locate.

Which begs the question: Why would the president wish to broker a cease-fire against a terrorist group that not only kills Jews, but also killed over 240 US Marines stationed in Lebanon as peacekeepers in 1983?

If anything, President Bush should be concerned about the Israelis having enough ammunition, bombs, rockets, missiles, tanks and planes. That’s the kind of engagement necessary to send those religious cutthroats to their 72 virgins.

“Hi there, Ehud. It’s George. You got enough ammo and equipment? Good. Well let me know if you need anything. Wait… Ehud. How about some of our bunker busters?”

The major media organizations, which we all know are lapdogs for the liberal politicians, are bombarding the American people with the key talking point that the Democrats support Israel. It’s the same type of support they generously bestow upon our own troops — you know, the troops they call Nazis, cold-blooded killers who run gulags and torture prisoners, while terrorizing women and children in the dark of night. Yeah, those troops. Good thing these libs support the US troops. I’d hate to hear what they have to say about our military if they didn’t support them.

So our friends on the left support Israel, but they want them to stop killing terrorists. It’s part and parcel of what Coulter describes in her book as a love affair with savages.

“But innocent Lebanese are being killed,” the libs say. Well, the fault for that should be pinned on Hezbollah, which uses civilians as human shields. The libs want the Israelis to use “proportionate force,” what ever the hell that is. Do they want Israel’s soldiers to strap on explosives and conduct suicide missions against Lebanese civilians? And isn’t it proportionate when Hezbollah and Hamas fire rockets into Israel’s cities killing and maiming civilians, and Israel fires their rockets and missiles into Lebanon? Actually, the civilian deaths and injuries caused by Israel are collateral, while Hezbollah is targeting civilians. Read the rest…

I’m not sure when it became a matter of academic achievement to blur the lines of right or wrong. While the liberal way of thinking would have you believe that it is a matter of philosophical translation, I think most people in the middle of the spectrum believe that a society cannot function without accountability and the general consensus of what is right and what is wrong. Ideally, it should have nothing to do with religion — although much of our core morality is rooted in Judeo-Christian beliefs — but one of humanity. It is wrong to kill, it is wrong to sexually violate a child (or adult for that matter), it is wrong to steal etc., etc. This should not be a matter of political correctness. Some behaviors should be viewed in black and white. Some behaviors are both socially and morally unacceptable and should not be left up to the political advantages of supporting these unacceptable behaviors without consequence. Once we become afraid to declare certain behaviors immoral or quite simply “wrong”, we unleash monsters like Hitler and allow it to happen or even worse, try to justify it.

Read the following story from The New Zealand Herald (and something that was barely reported here in the United States), and ask yourself how anybody can justify the actions of terrorists or sympathize with their cause(s) and not be condemned as if they committed the same such crimes agaisnt humanity:

In the first six months of the year the number of Iraqi civilians dying violently rose by 77 per cent.

The UN report paints a picture of Iraqi society dissolving under the stress of cumulative violence.     

Nobody is safe.     

A tennis coach and two players were shot dead in Baghdad for wearing shorts.     

Militias threaten the families of homosexuals ’stating they will begin killing family members unless men are handed over or killed by the family.’

Sectarian differences are behind most killings. Assassinations are often carried out by the security forces themselves.

On 3 June, for instance 50 police cars surrounded the al-Arab mosque in Basra and killed ten of the twenty people inside.

Sunni suicide bombers attack crowded Shia mosques and markets in order to cause maximum casualties.

Kidnapping, often of children, is common and the victims are frequently killed regardless of whether or not they have paid the ransom.

In one case the body of a 12-year-old Osama was reportedly found by the Iraqi Police in a plastic bag after his family paid a ransom of 30,000 US dollars.

The boy had been sexually assaulted by the kidnappers, before being hanged by his own clothing.

The police captured members of this gang who confessed to raping and killing many boys and girls before Osama. Read the rest…

Now mind you, these children who were raped, tortured, killed and some the victims of the Islamo-facist’s snuff films (little children here, folks), were Iraqi children. And no, America didn’t make ‘em do it, the devil didn’t make ‘em do it, George Bush didn’t make ‘em do it and the Jews didn’t make ‘em do it. This is not the time to try to figure out who’s right and wrong here, because if American’s are even questioning it, I fear we’ve gone too far to even save us. It’s not complicated. Basic human rights and common sense should tell you that this brand of Islam is wrong and needs to be stopped.  If that is a dilemma you cannot reason with, then I fear you might be a danger to the future of our children both in your ability to protect them and in the message it sends them.

Bookmark to: